Page 2 of 2

Re: Thank you for 10

Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 10:07 am
by kgb
Stackbarrel16 wrote:2004(1), 2005(2), 2006(3), 2007(4), 2008(5), 2009(6), 2010(7), 2011(8), 2012(9), 2013(10).

Then I am using old math.
Thanks, Scott, typing that many numbers confuses my fingers.

Re: Thank you for 10

Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 10:08 am
by Colonel Brown
Bayard16 wrote:I just looked at my "trophy" from #1 and it clearly says 2004.
So does mine. They obviously weren't one of a kind! Actually, I think Digger gave everyone the same trophy that year. Sorta typifies the Flatwater spirit.

Re: Thank you for 10

Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 10:14 am
by Stackbarrel16
Yep, you were all "special".

Re: Thank you for 10

Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 10:15 am
by Stackbarrel16
kgb wrote:
Stackbarrel16 wrote:2004(1), 2005(2), 2006(3), 2007(4), 2008(5), 2009(6), 2010(7), 2011(8), 2012(9), 2013(10).

Then I am using old math.
Thanks, Scott, typing that many numbers confuses my fingers.

No problem Kirk. I loved using so many commas.

Re: Thank you for 10

Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 10:20 am
by Digger
Thanks, Scott, typing that many numbers confuses my fingers. I'm still confused ?

Re: Thank you for 10

Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 10:46 am
by steve voss
Stack? Commas? TEOTWAWKI!

Re: Thank you for 10

Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 10:52 am
by Stackbarrel16
Yeah you and KGB bitched about "too many", now you bitch about too few, fuck you. :lol:

Re: Thank you for 10

Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 10:57 am
by steve voss
I was just glad to find out you knew what they were. Proper application can come later. :D

Re: Thank you for 10

Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2013 6:59 pm
by kgb
Baby steps, indeed!